{"id":11307,"date":"2023-11-16T17:09:25","date_gmt":"2023-11-16T17:09:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/eridehero.com\/?p=11307"},"modified":"2023-11-24T14:23:28","modified_gmt":"2023-11-24T14:23:28","slug":"apollo-phantom-v3-electric-scooter-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/eridehero.com\/apollo-phantom-v3-electric-scooter-review\/","title":{"rendered":"Apollo Phantom V3 Review: Premium Feel & Power"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

After six months and 300 miles of intense testing, I'm ready to reveal my in-depth review and performance results for the Apollo Phantom V3.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The launch of the first Apollo Phantom was a game-changer for me. It was my first experience with a high-end electric scooter, and the memory of that initial ride remains crystal clear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Fast forward a few years, I have tested over a dozen high-end scooters, but the V1 and V2 remain among the best I have tried<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The 2023 \"V3\" model came with towering expectations. Let's see if the Phantom line remains relevant in a rapidly growing industry with impressive contenders left and right.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Performance Summary<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

I took the Apollo Phantom V3 through our test process<\/a>. These are my performance results as a 175 lbs (79 kg) rider.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Top speed<\/td>41.2 MPH (66.3 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Acceleration
0-15 MPH<\/td>		Avg: 2.44 seconds
Best: 2.31 seconds<\/td><\/tr>
Acceleration
0-20 MPH<\/td>		Avg: 3.69 seconds
Best: 3.5 seconds<\/td><\/tr>
Acceleration
0-25 MPH<\/td>		Avg: 5.42 seconds
Best: 4.91 seconds<\/td><\/tr>
Acceleration
0-30 MPH<\/td>		Avg: 7.28 seconds
Best: 7 seconds<\/td><\/tr>
Hill climb
250ft @8%<\/td>		6 s (Avg Speed: 28.4 MPH)<\/td><\/tr>
Range (speed priority)<\/td>25.9 miles (41.7 km)<\/td><\/tr>
Range (regular)<\/td>32.4 miles (52.1 km)<\/td><\/tr>
Range (range priority)<\/td>37.3 miles (60 km)<\/td><\/tr>
Braking distance
15 MPH - 0 MPH<\/td>		9.8 ft (2.99 m)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Key Manufacturer Specs<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Motor Power<\/td>2 x 52V 1200W motors (2400W)<\/td><\/tr>
Battery<\/td>52V, 23.4Ah = 1216.8 Wh<\/td><\/tr>
Weight<\/td>77 lbs (34.9 kg)<\/td><\/tr>
Max Load<\/td>300 lbs (136.1 kg)<\/td><\/tr>
Tires<\/td>Quadruple spring<\/td><\/tr>
Brakes<\/td>Dual discs + regen<\/td><\/tr>
Suspension<\/td>Quadriple spring<\/td><\/tr>
Weather Resistance<\/td>IP54<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Speed & Motor Performance<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\"Apollo<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

Thanks to the new MACH 1 controller, the Phantom achieves thrilling performance with incredibly smooth power delivery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The Apollo Phantom V3 boasts dual 52V motors with a nominal power output of 2,400W. It has a stated maximum speed of 41 MPH (66 KMH).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The MACH 1 controller<\/strong> is at the heart of the V3's performance enhancements. According to Apollo, it increases efficiency by 27%<\/strong>, which I felt in acceleration and hill climbing ability. Not only does it pull away faster, but its 25A power delivery is buttery smooth<\/strong>, unlike anything I've ever felt below $2,500.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The upgraded controller now features app integration, allowing you to tailor the Phantom to your liking. You can adjust speed modes, set cruise control, choose between zero\/kick start, and fine-tune the acceleration curve to suit your preferences. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

I love that the Apollo Phantom V3 can adapt to any rider profile. Whether you want a high-performance adrenaline rush or the comfort and range of a tamed beast at 20 MPH, this versatile scooter can be dialed in to match everyone's needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Top Speed Test<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

In my tests, I consistently hit a top speed of 41.2 MPH (66.3 KMH)<\/strong>. This is a tad less than what I achieved with the V1 but still more than what Apollo states.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Tested<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
Model<\/th>Top Speed<\/th>$\/Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/u><\/td>41.2 MPH
(66.3 KMH)<\/td>		-<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>45.1 MPH
(72.6 KMH)<\/td>		-<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO$1,499.00 USD<\/a><\/td>36.5 MPH
(58.7 KMH)<\/td>		$41.07\/MPH<\/a><\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>36.3 MPH
(58.4 KMH)<\/td>		-<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Apollo Phantom positions itself in the middle of its class<\/strong>. It is one of the more expensive models relative to top speed, but it is a notable step up from the Apollo Ghost<\/a> and Inokim OxO.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Limited by its 52V, it can't quite keep up with the VSETT 10+ and Mantis King GT<\/strong>, which operate at 60V. Still, it is a hauntingly fast ride with more than enough power to satisfy speed fanatics.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Acceleration Test<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The V3 is far superior in acceleration performance from its predecessors. In my tests, it roughly accelerates 11% faster than the V2<\/strong>. This improvement can be attributed to the more efficient MACH 1 controller.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Acceleration<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
Interval<\/th>Average<\/th>Best<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
0-15 MPH (24 KMH)<\/td>2.44 s<\/td>2.31 s<\/td><\/tr>
0-20 MPH (32.2 KMH)<\/td>3.69 s<\/td>3.5 s<\/td><\/tr>
0-25 MPH (40.2 KMH)<\/td>5.42 s<\/td>4.91 s<\/td><\/tr>
0-30 MPH (48.2 KMH)<\/td>7.28 s<\/td>7 s<\/td><\/tr>
0-41.2 MPH (66.3 KMH)<\/td>12.9 s<\/td>12.1 s<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Phantom packs a punch, and the power delivery is incredibly smooth<\/strong>. High-power scooters tend to feel jumpy when operating the throttle at lower speeds (I am talking about you, Dualtron).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This births a bad habit of pressing the throttle in split-second bursts. It makes for an uncomfortable ride, but it is also inefficient and can be unsafe at times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Thanks to an incredibly smooth low-latency throttle<\/strong> with minimal dead space<\/strong> and tactile feedback, however, that isn't the case on the Apollo Phantom V3. Finessing the throttle is as intuitive as anything.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Tested<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
Model<\/th>0-15 MPH<\/th>0-20 MPH<\/th>0-25 MPH<\/th>0-30 MPH<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>2.44 s<\/td>3.69 s<\/td>5.42 s<\/td>7.28 s<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>2.02 s<\/td>3.44 s<\/td>5.01 s<\/td>6.98 s<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>3.63 s<\/td>5.01 s<\/td>6.92 s<\/td>9.81 s<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>2.82 s<\/td>4.3 s<\/td>6.23 s<\/td>9.22 s<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Holding it up against the competition, the Phantom is, once again, vastly superior to the Ghost and OxO<\/strong>. As expected, the 60V systems in the VSETT 10+ and Mantis King GT are about 15% faster<\/strong> off the line.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hill Climb Test<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Hill climbing demands power, and the Apollo Phantom has that in excess.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I put this dual-motor beast to the test on a 250 ft (76 m) incline with an average grade of 8%, and it conquered it in just 6 seconds with an average speed of 28.4 MPH (45.7 KMH)<\/strong>. While I don't have steeper inclines in my area, I'm pretty confident it can handle up to 25%<\/strong> based on experience and some number-crunching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Model<\/th>Time<\/th>Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>6 s<\/td>28.4 MPH (45.7 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>5.6 s<\/td>30.4 MPH (49 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>7.6 s<\/td>22.4 MPH (36.1 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>6.9 s<\/td>24.7 MPH (39.8 KMH)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

When it comes to tackling hills, it's only about 6% slower than the VSETT 10+ and Mantis King GT<\/strong>. It easily outperforms the Ghost<\/strong> with a comfortable lead and leaves the Inokim OxO in the dust<\/strong> with an impressive 23% difference.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Motor Performance Summary<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Apollo Phantom V3 is a truly versatile dual-motor electric scooter with enough power to tackle the most demanding challenges<\/strong>. While there are a few contenders that beat it on sheer motor performance, it offers one of the smoothest acceleration curves I've ever tested<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

If you want a scooter that is as smooth at 20 MPH as 40 MPH, the Phantom is a great choice. It will handle riders up to 285 lbs (130 kg) on steep inclines and mixed terrain<\/strong> effortlessly, with minimal performance impact. Even for riders nearing the 300 lbs weight limit, it will still deliver impressive performance, albeit with a slight reduction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Range & Battery Performance<\/h2>\n\n\n
\n
\"Closeup<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

With 32.4 miles of real-world range, the Phantom can go the distance even at high speeds. However, some competitors offer more range at the same price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This electric scooter sports a 52V, 23.4Ah battery<\/strong> with a 1216.8 Wh<\/strong> capacity. Apollo advertises a max range of 50 miles (80.5 km)<\/strong> under conservative riding conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I was hoping Apollo would introduce 21700 cell technology for its greater energy density, as seen in the City Pro<\/a> and Pro. However, it still uses the same 126 x 18650 cell structure<\/strong> we saw in the V1 and V2.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It looks like Apollo is sticking to what already works but without much innovation battery-wise. The fact that this scooter has a 52V battery leaves a slight performance gap compared to 60V alternatives<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Battery Capacity Comparison<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Model<\/th>Battery Capacity<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>1216.8 Wh
(52V, 23.4Ah)<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>1536 Wh
(60V, 25.6Ah)<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>1560 Wh
(60V, 26Ah)<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>946.4 Wh
(52V, 18.2Ah)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah) boasts a 23% higher battery capacity<\/strong> than the Phantom, while the Mantis King GT outclasses it by 17%<\/strong>. The Inokim OxO, with its impressive battery size, seems to provide the best capacity for its price in its category. The Phantom still leaves a welcome gap down to the Ghost, which is also reflected in range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Regarding battery capacity relative to price, the Phantom is one of the more expensive options in the high-end scooter class.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Range Tests<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Battery capacity, cell technology, and hypothetical numbers don't tell the whole story.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

I conducted three range tests at varying speeds to understand the real-world performance of the Apollo Phantom 2023.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Test (#)<\/th>Range<\/th>Avg. Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
#1: Speed Priority<\/td>25.9 miles
41.7 km<\/td>		29.8 MPH
48 KMH<\/td><\/tr>
#2: Regular<\/td>32.4 miles
52.1 km<\/td>		22.3 MPH
35.9 KMH<\/td><\/tr>
#3: Range Priority<\/td>37.3 miles
60 km<\/td>		16.2 MPH
26.1 KMH<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

In the first test, focusing on speed and going full throttle<\/strong>, I managed to cover a distance of 25.9 miles<\/strong> (41.7 km).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the second test, cruising at a more comfortable pace, I achieved the most accurate real-world result<\/strong>, with a range of 32.4 miles<\/strong> (52.1 km).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In the last test, where I aimed to maximize range by riding slowly<\/strong> and relying heavily on regenerative brakes, I achieved 37.3 miles<\/strong> (60 km) of range.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

All tests were done in the fastest speed mode to establish a comparable basis for the results. In tests #2 and #3, I capped the top speed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Range Comparison<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

I conducted the same range of tests on all of the competitors. These are my results.<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"Tested<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

#1: Speed Priority<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Model<\/th>Range<\/th>Avg. Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>25.9 miles
(41.7 km)<\/td>		29.8 MPH
(48 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>32.8 miles
(52.8 km)<\/td>		30.3 MPH
(48.8 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>34.2 miles
(55 km)<\/td>		27.1 MPH
(43.6 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>20.3 miles
(32.7 km)<\/td>		27.6 MPH
(44.4 KMH)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
Test #1 (Speed Priority), 175 lbs (80 kg) rider<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Expectedly, the Phantom falls behind the higher-capacity competitors<\/strong>. However, quite surprisingly, it's only 3 miles behind the Mantis King GT<\/strong> (which even has 21700 cells). This hints at good ride efficiency and battery quality.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#2: Regular<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Model<\/th>Range<\/th>Avg. Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>32.4 miles
(52.1 km)<\/td>		22.3 MPH
(35.9 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>38.4 miles
(61.8 km)<\/td>		21.9 MPH
(35.2 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>39.11 miles
(62.9 km)<\/td>		20.9 MPH
(33.6 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>27.3 miles
(43.9 km)<\/td>		21.1 MPH
(34 KMH)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
Test #2 (Regular Speed), 175 lbs (80 kg) rider<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The Apollo Phantom edges closer to the Mantis King GT<\/strong> in the regular range test. This indicates the Mantis may be slightly more efficient at high speeds.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

#3: Range Priority<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
Model<\/th>Range<\/th>Avg. Speed<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>37.3 miles
(60 km)<\/td>		16.2 MPH
(26.1 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>45.2 miles
(72.7 km)<\/td>		16.8 MPH
(27 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>44.21 miles
(71.1 km)<\/td>		15.72 MPH
(25.3 KMH)<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>32.2 miles
(51.8 km)<\/td>		14.6 MPH
(23.5 KMH)<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table>
Test #3 (Range Priority), 175 lbs (80 kg) rider<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

The range priority test closely mirrors the results of test #2. In comparison, the VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah) provides approximately 19% more range<\/strong>, while the Inokim OxO offers a 17% increase in range<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Range-Weight Ratio<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Like its competitors, the Phantom is a heavyweight. But how does it fare in terms of range relative to weight?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Model<\/th>Range<\/th>Weight<\/th>Ratio<\/th><\/tr><\/thead>
Apollo Phantom V4<\/td>32.4 miles<\/td>77 lbs<\/td>0.42 miles\/lb<\/td><\/tr>
VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah)<\/td>38.4 miles<\/td>79 lbs<\/td>0.49 miles\/lb<\/td><\/tr>
Inokim OxO<\/td>39.11 miles<\/td>74 lbs<\/td>0.53 miles\/lb<\/td><\/tr>
Apollo Ghost<\/td>27.3 miles<\/td>66.1 lbs<\/td>0.41 miles\/lb<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

With a 0.42 miles per pound ratio<\/strong>, the Phantom is relatively heavy considering its real-world range. While it doesn't lag far behind its competitors, it's worth considering if you prioritize portable performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Charging<\/h3>\n\n\n
\n
\"Dual<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n

The Phantom 2023 comes with a 58.8V 2A charger and an approximate charging time of 12 hours<\/strong>. This is relatively slow, but with two charging ports, you can cut that time in half by purchasing an extra charger<\/strong>. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

You can also purchase Apollo's fast charger<\/a> to decrease the charging time further, although we recommend limiting charging to 4A to improve the longevity of battery cells.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In comparison, the Mantis King GT has two chargers out of the box for a 6-hour charge cycle. The VSETT 10+ comes with a single 2A charger and takes around 12 hours to fill up, but it also supports dual charging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Battery Performance Summary<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

The Apollo Phantom V3 stays competitive and has ample real-world range for the vast majority of electric scooter riders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, its capacity and real-world range performance are a level below that of the King Mantis GT, Inokim OxO, and VSETT 10+ (25.6Ah). If range relative to price is your deciding factor, the alternatives may match your needs better.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ride Quality<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\t